The public sacking of Rick Wagoner is long overdue but that it has had to come from the President of the United States shows the sort of mess the company is in. Wagoner saw it coming and was making appearances on the Colbert Report advertising the Chevrolet Volt which was supposed to make all the pain go away. Colbert's jokes about plugging the Volt into his Hummer led to an unnatural laugh from Wagoner. The Damocles sword has clearly hung over his head for too long yet I cannot feel any sympathy for him. Men like him have destroyed the car, making it an expensive means of conveyance rather than a work of art as it used to be. He along with others have betrayed the legacy of industry stalwarts from Henry Ford to Enzo Ferrari and John DeLorean to Lee Iacocca. What must Iacocca be thinking when he sees the company he led through an exhaustive bailout in 1979 being commanded to merge with Fiat? Fiat itself has been run into the ground by the latter generations of the Agnelli family. Why should they survive as one entity? Mercedes Benz and Chrysler was a disastrous marriage just 10 years ago. Few have the right to hold their head high in this fiasco.
I am incensed most that the car as we have known it is dying out. Vehicles like Tata Nano dominate the Indian news while other hybrids such as the Toyota Prius and Honda Civic have been doing the rounds for some time. For all their worldy benefits they do not make the heart skip a beat. The curves were lost some time ago. Cars used to emote from every line. The Jaguar E-Type was the definition of sexy for the 1960s with icons such as George Best closely associated with its buxom shape. There is no grill like that of the Corvette Stingray, no doors like those of the Gullwing, no unbridled roar like that of the V8 under the hood of the GTO. For all the world's GPS satnavs there is no technologically groundbreaking car like the Citroen DS with its headlights that moved where you wanted them to and a hydraulic suspension system that is still marveled at. I don't think I can fall in love with a car in its first scene in a movie like I did with the Alfa Romeo in The Graduate. Nothing to change the English language as the Duesenberg did in the 1920s spawning the word 'doozy'. And in some cases, words cannot do justice to the ephemerality of the Mercedes-Benz 500 K Roadster. Maybe that is why I love it most and always will.

There will be the Porsches churned out year after year, mechanical precision inside and out. Ferraris will always come out red and the Aston Martin will try to remind us of days gone past. Audis have managed to turn simplicity into style. They give me some hope. The trend though has been one of ugly cars that beg to be remodeled after 3 years and to fade away in junk yards. They do not hold any magic that would appeal to an enthusiast to have them restored. Masses of Corollas and VW Golfs ready to be compacted. Even the progress of technology only serves to highlight how the vintage cars I treasure now may not be around in 30-40 years. Every car that comes with a processor is now serviced by computers more than by people. I requested a car restorer to give me an apprenticeship to restore vintage cars at his shop. He told me bluntly that I was not an artisan and it is only they who can do the very specialized jobs of moulding these aged beasts back in one piece. Every year there are fewer and fewer skilled men with the ability and willingness to work on them. It leaves me with a heavy heart to know that something I love so may not be around for too much longer. I feel bad for future generations who may be left with derivatives of the Tata Nano and little else because of choices that leadership, management and millions of others made on vehicles without souls. Any number of ultimatums from Obama will not roll back the clock. I am lucky, as apparently it is better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all.
Clearly this august funk-noodle guy doesn't know what he's talking about.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, how can you have a car post and not mention one of the most innovative car companies? They were hailed for their new and ground breaking approach to styling yet Oldsmobile does not earn even the slightest acknowledgment of contribution of excellence.
Secondly, the art in car production has not gone away. The reality is that the beauty in cars is now hidden. (Which I feel is perfectly acceptable with current minimalist trends). It is the nuts and the bolts that bring out the excellence in cars. And hey, we all know those machines can do a better job than us with a monkey wrench so why get our hands dirty?
Now what it comes down to is the beauty in the car building robots. Who brings those to life? The programmers.
Yes sir, the programmers are the Chris Bangles and the Walter de Silvas of today. They might not live the life and come into the spotlight like the mighty Pininfarinas but the little cubicles in which they reside is just enough for them to bring inner beauty and harmony to metal and rubber. (No carbon fibre please)
I can't very well name every car ever. There were some beautiful Oldsmobiles especially in the 1930s, 40s and 50s. I'm not a fan of those monsters from the 80s.
ReplyDeleteBeauty is hidden where? Would you have a V8 in a Mustang now or a 1965 Mustang? More powerful doesn't mean cooler. And machines can build cars very well but suck at restoring them.
The rest I can see is all in jest so its all good.
huzzaaa!
ReplyDeleteOn a more serious note, don't you think that the progress that has been made in the automotive technology at a certain price?
ReplyDeleteThe technology used in cars today is out of reach of your everyday hobbyist / mechanic.
Well, technology in terms of the advancement in current cars doesn't really apply to hobbyists as they aren't usually interested in such vehicles. With regards to mechanics yes, these cars usually go to their official workshops now as compared to the mechanic around the neighbourhood.
ReplyDeleteWhat is the cost, I don't know yet. The benefits are there for all to see in cheaper cars, better parts, easier to mass produce. They're more in range for the everyday man. As an afficianado, it means fewer people with the skills to use their hands and that will contribute to the dying of an art. It is what it is.